Dank, jammer dat een verdrag met zulke verregaande gevolgen zo 'geheim' moet blijven.
Er staat wel in dat de privacy gerespecteerd moet worden, en dat de genomen maatregelen proportioneel moeten zijn. Hoe zich dat in de praktijk ontwikkeld is nog maar de vraag.
each Party shall provide that its judicial authorities shall
have the authority [...] to issue an order to a party to desist from an infringement, including an order to prevent infringing goods from entering into the channels of commerce.
The Parties shall also ensure that right holders are in a position to apply for
an injunction against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party to infringe
an intellectual property right.
Het klinkt toch eng, gelukkig wordt de rechter niet meteen overboord gegooid, maar erg fris klinkt het niet.
Helaas, de privacy wordt toch overboord gegooid (al staat er wel dat de privacywetten gerespecteerd moeten worden

):
Without prejudice to a Party's laws pertaining to the privacy or confidentiality of
information:
a) each Party may authorize its competent authorities to provide right holders
with information about specific shipments of goods, including the
description and quantity, to assist in the detection of infringing goods;
b) each Party may authorize its competent authorities to provide right holders
with information about goods including, but not limited to, the description
and quantity of the goods and the name and address of the consignor,
importer, exporter or consignee, and, if known, the country of origin and
name and address of the manufacturer of the goods to assist in the
determination under Article 2.10 of whether goods infringe rights covered
by this section;
c) unless a Party has granted authority under subparagraph (b), at least in the
case of imported goods, where competent authorities have seized or, in the
alternative, made a determination under Article 2.10 that goods infringe
rights covered by the section, each Party shall authorize its competent
authorities to provide right holders within 30 days of seizure or
determination, with information about goods including, but not limited to,
the description and quantity of the goods and the name and address of the
consignor, importer, exporter, or consignee, and, if known, the country of
origin and name and address of the manufacturer of the goods.
Each Party may provide, in accordance with its laws and regulations, that its
competent authorities have the authority to order an online service provider to disclose
expeditiously the information of the relevant subscriber to the right holders, who have
given legally sufficient claim with valid reasons to be infringing their {US: copyright or
related rights}{J/EU: intellectual property rights}. [US/J/NZ: Each Party may provide,
in accordance with its laws and regulations, its competent authorities with the authority
to order an online service provider to disclose expeditiously to a right holder, or to a
person authorized by the right holder, information sufficient to identify an alleged
infringer, where that right holder has filed a legally sufficient claim of infringement of
{US: copyright or related rights}{J/EU: intellectual property rights} and where such
information is being sought for the purpose of protecting or {enforcing the right
holder's {US: copyright or related rights}{J/EU: intellectual property rightss}.]

Alleen al het feit dat de gegevens aan de "rechthebbende" gegeven moeten worden in plaats van aan de opsporende en vervolgende instanties breekt dit hele verdrag.
Each Party shall provide adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies
against the circumvention of effective technological measures that are used by
authors, and [US: performers] and producers of
phonograms in connection with the exercise of their copyright.
Verregaande DRM maatregelen moeten dus
door de strot geduwd blindelings gerespecteerd en geaccepteerd worden?
[Reactie gewijzigd door donny007 op 26 juli 2024 01:02]