Concurrentie klaar voor strijd met Google

Ik denk dat de concurrentie samen met Google nu wel weet dat portals niet meer van deze tijd zijn. Maar er is nog veel te verbeteren aan de zoekresultaten, daar is nog erg veel gebied dat door alle partijen kan worden ingenomen.

Onlangs vond ik overigens iets met Yahoo dat ik met dezelfde termen in Google niet kon opduikelen. Tijd om eens niet meer onconditioneel Google te gebruiken dus!

Zoeken op MSN op de term Linux:

4.)Lindows - Een programma van Michael Robertson dat het mogelijk maakt zowel Linux als Windows programma's te gebruiken op je computer. Zie Michaels Minutes.(http://www.lindows.com)

Zoeken op XFree:
6) XFree 4.01 - Linux Installation Strategies mini-HOWTO 13. XFree 4.01 It's a good idea to upgrade your Xserver to 4.01 . ... OpenGL accelerated drivers cheers to them. See XFree 's home site http://www.xfree86.org/ for more info.

Dus ik weet niet waar je je info vandaan haalt maar het valt dus wel mee.

Vooral Lindows.com vind ik een prachtig zoekresultaat :-)

Dat is een kwestie van goed gebruik maken van de searchengine, bijv. door review of specifications erbij te tikken.

Wordt wakker:

1. Google's immortal cookie:
Google was the first search engine to use a cookie that expires in 2038. This was at a time when federal websites were prohibited from using persistent cookies altogether. Now it's years later, and immortal cookies are commonplace among search engines; Google set the standard because no one bothered to challenge them. This cookie places a unique ID number on your hard disk. Anytime you land on a Google page, you get a Google cookie if you don't already have one. If you have one, they read and record your unique ID number.

2. Google records everything they can:
For all searches they record the cookie ID, your Internet IP address, the time and date, your search terms, and your browser configuration. Increasingly, Google is customizing results based on your IP number. This is referred to in the industry as "IP delivery based on geolocation."

3. Google retains all data indefinitely:
Google has no data retention policies. There is evidence that they are able to easily access all the user information they collect and save.

4. Google won't say why they need this data:
Inquiries to Google about their privacy policies are ignored. When the New York Times (2002-11-28) asked Sergey Brin about whether Google ever gets subpoenaed for this information, he had no comment.

5. Google hires spooks:
Matt Cutts, a key Google engineer, used to work for the National Security Agency. Google wants to hire more people with security clearances, so that they can peddle their corporate assets to the spooks in Washington.

6. Google's toolbar is spyware:
With the advanced features enabled, Google's free toolbar for Explorer phones home with every page you surf, and yes, it reads your cookie too. Their privacy policy confesses this, but that's only because Alexa lost a class-action lawsuit when their toolbar did the same thing, and their privacy policy failed to explain this. Worse yet, Google's toolbar updates to new versions quietly, and without asking. This means that if you have the toolbar installed, Google essentially has complete access to your hard disk every time you connect to Google (which is many times a day). Most software vendors, and even Microsoft, ask if you'd like an updated version. But not Google. Any software that updates automatically presents a massive security risk.

7. Google's cache copy is illegal:
Judging from Ninth Circuit precedent on the application of U.S. copyright laws to the Internet, Google's cache copy appears to be illegal. The only way a webmaster can avoid having his site cached on Google is to put a "noarchive" meta in the header of every page on his site. Surfers like the cache, but webmasters don't. Many webmasters have deleted questionable material from their sites, only to discover later that the problem pages live merrily on in Google's cache. The cache copy should be "opt-in" for webmasters, not "opt-out."

8. Google is not your friend:
By now Google enjoys a 75 percent monopoly for all external referrals to most websites. Webmasters cannot avoid seeking Google's approval these days, assuming they want to increase traffic to their site. If they try to take advantage of some of the known weaknesses in Google's semi-secret algorithms, they may find themselves penalized by Google, and their traffic disappears. There are no detailed, published standards issued by Google, and there is no appeal process for penalized sites. Google is completely unaccountable. Most of the time Google doesn't even answer email from webmasters.

9. Google is a privacy time bomb:
With 200 million searches per day, most from outside the U.S., Google amounts to a privacy disaster waiting to happen. Those newly-commissioned data-mining bureaucrats in Washington can only dream about the sort of slick efficiency that Google has already achieved.

Concurentie is altijd goed. Of het resultaat nu is dat er een nieuwe zoekmachine komt die beter is dan Google of dat Google naar aanleiding hiervan zijn zoekmachine verbetert, het resultaat voor ons, gebruikers, is: een betere zoekmachine.

Overigens heb ik wel het idee dat Google zich veel beter dan vorige zoekmachine-toppers (Yahoo, Altavista, HotBot) realiseert dat ze moeten blijven werken om aan top te blijven.