Iedere vorm van straling in de frequentiebanden van 5G zijn niet energetisch genoeg om significante invloed te hebben op het menselijke lichaam. Totdat er een 100G standaard met ioniserende straling komt, is er geen aannemelijk risico voor de volksgezondheid.
Is dat zo? Weet u dat absoluut zeker? Ik vind het te makkelijk om onderstaande samenvatting van wetenschappelijke onderzoeken, dan maar af te doen al alu-hoedje gekkigheid.
What are the effects produced by non-thermal exposures to microwave frequency EMFs, where
we have an extensive scientific literature? Each of the following effects has been documented in
from 12 to 34 reviews, listed at the end of Chapter 1.
1. Three types of cellular DNA attacks,
producing single strand breaks in the cellular DNA,
double strand breaks in cellular DNA and oxidized bases in cellular DNA. Each of these
DNA changes have roles in cancer causation and in producing the most important
mutational changes in humans and diverse animals. Double stranded DNA breaks
produce chromosomal breaks, rearrangements, deletions and duplications and copy
number mutations; they also produce gene amplification, an important mechanism in
cancer causation. Single strand breaks in cellular DNA cause aberrant recombination
events leading to copy number mutations. Oxidized bases cause point mutations. When
these occur in somatic cells, they can each have roles in causing cancer. When these
occur in germ line cells (and they have be shown to occur in sperm following EMF
exposures), they cause the three most important types of mutations in future generations,
chromosomal mutations, copy number mutations and point mutations. (21 different
reviews documenting these types of cellular DNA damage)
2. A wide variety of changes leading to lowered male fertility, lowered female fertility,
increased spontaneous abortion, lowered levels of estrogen, progesterone and
testosterone, lowered libido (18 reviews)
. Human sperm count has dropped to below
50% of what used to be considered normal throughout the technologically advanced
countries of the world . Reproductive rates have fallen below replacement levels
in every technologically advanced country of the world, with a single exception. These
include every EU country, the U.S., Canada, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore,
Australia and New Zealand. Reproduction averages, in these countries, about 73% of
replacement levels according to 2015 or 2016 data. A study on mouse reproduction 
showed that radio/microwave frequency EMF exposure at doses well within our current
safety guidelines produced substantial dose-dependent decreases in reproduction within
the first set of litters; further exposure produced dose-dependent complete or almost
complete sterility that was found to be largely irreversible. When we have a technology
that is universally present in these technologically advanced countries, that we know
impacts reproduction, and reproduction has already dropped well below replacement
levels, and we may be facing a catastrophic and irreversible decline in reproduction and
there are more and more plans to expose us still further, don't you think that we should
take note of the science? Mr. Ryan and Dr. Vinciūnas seem to be saying not at all.
(Please note that the U.S. FCC and FDA also completely ignore this existential threat)
3. Neurological/neuropsychiatric effects (25 reviews).
My own paper on this  and two
earlier reviews cited in it found that there are whole series of repeatedly found EMF
effects which have also become extremely widespread complaints in our technologically
advanced societies, namely: sleep disturbance/insomnia; fatigue/tiredness; headache;
depression/depressive symptoms; lack of concentration/attention/cognitive dysfunction;
dizziness/vertigo; memory changes; restlessness/tension/anxiety/stress/agitation;
irritability. These findings are not just based on epidemiological findings but are also
based on profound impacts of EMFs, at levels well within our safety guidelines, on brain
structure and function and also on the mechanism of non-thermal EMF action discussed
below. When we have these neuropsychiatric effects becoming more and more common
in technologically advanced societies all over the world, and we know each of these is
caused EMF exposures, shouldn't we take note of this relationship?
4. Apoptosis/cell death (13 reviews).
The two most important consequences of large
increases in apoptosis (programmed cell death) are in causation of the neurodegenerative
diseases and lowered reproduction although there are others.
5. Oxidative stress/free radical damage (19 reviews).
Oxidative stress has roles in all or
almost all chronic diseases. It is reported to have essential roles in producing the
reproductive effects and the attacks on cellular DNA and may also have roles in
producing the neurological effects and some of the cancer-causing effects shown to be
produced here by EMF exposures.
6. Widespread endocrine (that is hormonal) effects (12 reviews).
The steroid hormone
levels drop with EMF exposure, whereas other hormone levels increase with initial
exposure. The neuroendocrine hormones and insulin levels often drop with prolonged
EMF exposure, possibly due to endocrine exhaustion.
7. Increases in intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) levels following EMF exposure (15
Calcium signaling also increases following EMF exposure.
8. Cancer causation (35 reviews).
Brain cancer, salivary cancer, acoustic neuromas and two
other types of cancer go up with cell phone use. People living near cell phone towers
have increased cancer rates. Other types of EMFs are each implicated. Short wave radio,
radio ham operators and people exposed to radar all are reported to have increased cancer
incidence. Perhaps most telling, heavy-long term cell phone users have the highest
incidence of brain cancer and have predominantly cancer increases on the ipsilateral side
of the head (the side they use their cell phones), as opposed to the contralateral side. I
have a paper , focused not on whether EMFs cause cancer but rather on how they can
cause cancer. The paper shows that "downstream effects" of the main target of the EMFs
in the cells of our bodies, can cause cancer in 15 different ways, including increases in
cancer initiation, promotion and progression. Progression effects include both tissue
invasion and metastasis. Each of these cancer causation effects are caused via
mechanisms produced by downstream effects of the main non-thermal EMF mechanism,
as discussed in Chapter 2.
9. Therapeutic effects of such EMFs.
Such EMFs when focused on a specific region of the
body where there is some dysfunction and when used at specific intensities, can have
therapeutic effects. In my 2013 paper , I cited 12 different reviews where EMF 6
stimulation of bone growth was used therapeutically. There are something like 4000
papers on various therapeutic effects. Strangely, the telecommunications industry does
not acknowledge these therapeutic effects, preferring rather to maintain the fiction that
there are no non-thermal effects.