Chronos schrijft dat het erop lijkt dat Intel erg veel (te veel) moeite heeft gedaan om de Celeron II een low-end CPU te maken, waarschijnlijk heeft Intel besloten dat we de pinnetjes voor smp niet nodig hebben bij een Celeron II :
The 566 Celerons that AZZO supplied us are PRODUCTION CPUs that are coming "off the shelf". We ran both CPUs independently with good results on the ABIT BP6 with the QQ BIOS installed. This was with using the Powerleap adapter. We could not get the BP6 to boot and recognize both processors in the BIOS. Hopefully we have done something wrong and are incorrect with our observation, but I doubt it. I don't think Dually Celeron-IIs are going to be a reality without a SERIOUS workaround. Still I would like to see another site confirm this to be sure. Sorry for the bad news.......
I thought I'd let you know that our R&D guys have also tried dual Celeron-II 566 MHz CPUs in the BP6, with and without the Neo-S370, and they refuse work in dual-mode. Dual P-III's are fine, so there must be some crucial difference in the Celeron-II pinout or something. We are looking at this, but the initial opinion of the engineers is not very optimistic. Looks like Intel might have "bonded out" the SMP pins, which would rule out any work-arounds. But they're not 100% sure.....
Naast HardOCP heeft ook BP6.com geprobeerd om de een dual celeron II met twee Neo-S370 converters op een BP6 plankje te draaien, iets wat niet echt succesvol was .