In the 2D/3D category, we first consider Cinebench, a rendering test based on Maxxon Cinema 4D. This reveals the greatest performance gain so far: the quadcore performs 68% better than the dualcore of the same clock speed, and 53% better than the previous Extreme Edition:
 |
 | Cinebench R9.5 x64 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme QX6700 |   1449 |  |
 |
 | Dual Opteron 2216 |   1233 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme X6800 |   945 |  |
 |
 | Athlon FX-62 |   867 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6700 |   858 |  |
 |
 | Athlon X2 5000+ |   809 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6400 |   688 |  |
 |
In the Photoshop CS2 Filtertest, various filters and transformations are performed on a set of five photographs (two with a resolution of six megapixels, and three with a ten megapixel resolution. The result of the test is the total time that Photoshop CS 2 needed for the execution of the transformations. Here, too, the quadcore proves its mettle, but not as convincingly as in the Cinebench test:
 |
 | Photoshop CS2 Filtertest (time) |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme QX6700 |   112.6 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme X6800 |   133.0 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6700 |   139.7 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6400 |   171.0 |  |
 |
 | Athlon FX-62 |   186.0 |  |
 |
 | Dual Opteron 2216 |   195.7 |  |
 |
 | Athlon X2 5000+ |   209.8 |  |
 |
The next benchmark is a combination of the Photoshop CS2 Filtertest and importing a photo shoot in the background, which consists of 199 RAW images in Adobe Lightroom (beta 3). We indicate the time needed for both applications. The dual Opteron, which was playing second fiddle in the tests so far, manages to show its teeth here by beating the Kentsfield in Photoshop. However, the Opteron's performance is probably more due to the RAID5 array than to computing power. Moreover, the AMD system spends longer on the other application, making the QX6700 the winner after all:
 |
 | Photoshop + Lightroom (Photoshop time) |  |
 |
 | Dual Opteron 2216 |   207.2 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme QX6700 |   235.5 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme X6800 |   267.6 |  |
 |
 | Athlon FX-62 |   285.6 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6700 |   290.5 |  |
 |
 | Athlon X2 5000+ |   300.2 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6400 |   341.8 |  |
 |
 |
 | Photoshop + Lightroom (Lightroom time) |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme QX6700 |   664.6 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme X6800 |   779.9 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6700 |   867.6 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6400 |   927.6 |  |
 |
 | Dual Opteron 2216 |   991.8 |  |
 |
 | Athlon FX-62 |   1065.8 |  |
 |
 | Athlon X2 5000+ |   1111.9 |  |
 |
We ran the Photoshop CS2 Filtertest for a third time with another application running in the background. This time, 102 JPEG images are de-noised using Neat Image 5.5, and subsequently saved as .tiff files. Again, we show what time both applications needed. The quadcore does a very good job by beating its dualcore predecessor by three minutes, which means a cut in the time needed of 37%:
 |
 | Photoshop + Neat Image (Photoshop time) |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme QX6700 |   133.7 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme X6800 |   173.5 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6700 |   184.1 |  |
 |
 | Athlon FX-62 |   223.6 |  |
 |
 | Dual Opteron 2216 |   244.7 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6400 |   278.4 |  |
 |
 | Athlon X2 5000+ |   318.9 |  |
 |
 |
 | Photoshop + Neat Image (Neat Image time) |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme QX6700 |   310.2 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Extreme X6800 |   448.0 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6700 |   494.7 |  |
 |
 | Dual Opteron 2216 |   581.1 |  |
 |
 | Core 2 Duo E6400 |   618.8 |  |
 |
 | Athlon FX-62 |   734.7 |  |
 |
 | Athlon X2 5000+ |   779.9 |  |
 |