Door Redactie Tweakers

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 review

Introduction to 'Kentsfield'

Dit artikel is ook in het Nederlands beschikbaar.
Note: Links appearing in this article point mostly to articles in Dutch on this site. In many cases, you can find the information that is referred to in English by clicking on the link labeled 'bron' ('source') underneath the title on the page to which you are taken.

On April 18 2005, Intel was the first to come with an x86 dualcore processor. Today, a little more than eighteen months later, the next step is here in the form of the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 (codename Kentsfield): the first quadcore x86. As the name implies, the new 'Extreme' has some impressive specs: a clock speed of 2.66GHz, 2x 4MB of L2 cache, and – on a slightly less positive note – a 130Watt TDP. received a test sample from Intel, and in this article we take a first look at the new addition to Intel's line-up.

* Kentsfield's architecture

If Intel is to be believed, Kentsfield is fully compatible with the current line-up of Core 2 Duo motherboards. In certain cases a BIOS update is needed for the CPU to be recognised correctly, but it uses the same socket (LGA775) and the same 1066MHz bus. Although it consumes more energy than the dualcores, this does not exceed the maximum specifications – after all, 130Watt is needed to power the old Pentium D. Internally, Kentsfield consists of two Core 2 Duo E6700 'Conroe' chips. This design choice has been the subject of heated debates: especially AMD likes to remind us that gluing together two separate chips does not constitute a quadcore proper. It is certainly true that this choice has its downfalls: the one pair of cores can only communicate with the other via the bus, which limits the available memory bandwidth. Moreover, there is no shared cache, meaning that data can be stored twice, limiting the effectiveness of the total memory capacity of 8MB. For this reason, several benchmarks will do better on a single chip quadcore than on an MPM (multi-processor module) consisting of two dualcores.

Intel Core 2 Quad logoBut not everything about this design is negative: to make a Kentsfield, it suffices to pluck a small percentage of dualcores from the production line and package them in a different way. This is a much faster process than building a separate quadcore production line. Moreover, the yields will be greater: a greater square makes the round wafer surface harder to fill, and consequently a larger portion of the disc will be lost in case of an error. Half a broken MPM quadcore can still be sold as a dualcore, but the term yield has more subtleties in practice than merely 'perfect' and 'trash'. Statistics, too, has a say in how the line-up will end up looking: In case ten percent of quadcores achieve the desired TDP, production will need to be increased tenfold compared to the perfect world scenario. By also selling versions with a lower clock value, things can be optimized, but it is less risky to aim high if there are stocks of millions of Meroms, Conroes, and Woodcrests to choose from.

According to internal research at Intel, the two dualcore approach makes for 20% higher yields and 10% less costs. The company has worked out that a single chip quadcore would cost $79,85 to make, against $71,10 for an MPM solution. Incidentally, such prices are - by far - not for the consumer: Intel will still happily asks a thousand dollars for a Core 2 Extreme QX6700. But the consumer's advantage is that Intel's quadcores will soon be available, and not in half a year's time as is the case with AMD. By the time that company ships its first quadcore, Intel expects to have sold a million of them for use in desktops and servers.

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 quadcore processor

Wat vind je van dit artikel?

Geef je mening in het Geachte Redactie-forum.

Nintendo Switch (OLED model) Apple iPhone SE (2022) LG G1 Google Pixel 6 Call of Duty: Vanguard Samsung Galaxy S22 Garmin fēnix 7 Nintendo Switch Lite

Tweakers vormt samen met Hardware Info, AutoTrack,, Nationale Vacaturebank, Intermediair en Independer DPG Online Services B.V.
Alle rechten voorbehouden © 1998 - 2022 Hosting door True

Tweakers maakt gebruik van cookies

Tweakers plaatst functionele en analytische cookies voor het functioneren van de website en het verbeteren van de website-ervaring. Deze cookies zijn noodzakelijk. Om op Tweakers relevantere advertenties te tonen en om ingesloten content van derden te tonen (bijvoorbeeld video's), vragen we je toestemming. Via ingesloten content kunnen derde partijen diensten leveren en verbeteren, bezoekersstatistieken bijhouden, gepersonaliseerde content tonen, gerichte advertenties tonen en gebruikersprofielen opbouwen. Hiervoor worden apparaatgegevens, IP-adres, geolocatie en surfgedrag vastgelegd.

Meer informatie vind je in ons cookiebeleid.


Toestemming beheren

Hieronder kun je per doeleinde of partij toestemming geven of intrekken. Meer informatie vind je in ons cookiebeleid.

Functioneel en analytisch

Deze cookies zijn noodzakelijk voor het functioneren van de website en het verbeteren van de website-ervaring. Klik op het informatie-icoon voor meer informatie. Meer details


    Relevantere advertenties

    Dit beperkt het aantal keer dat dezelfde advertentie getoond wordt (frequency capping) en maakt het mogelijk om binnen Tweakers contextuele advertenties te tonen op basis van pagina's die je hebt bezocht. Meer details

    Tweakers genereert een willekeurige unieke code als identifier. Deze data wordt niet gedeeld met adverteerders of andere derde partijen en je kunt niet buiten Tweakers gevolgd worden. Indien je bent ingelogd, wordt deze identifier gekoppeld aan je account. Indien je niet bent ingelogd, wordt deze identifier gekoppeld aan je sessie die maximaal 4 maanden actief blijft. Je kunt deze toestemming te allen tijde intrekken.

    Ingesloten content van derden

    Deze cookies kunnen door derde partijen geplaatst worden via ingesloten content. Klik op het informatie-icoon voor meer informatie over de verwerkingsdoeleinden. Meer details