Inleiding Waarom de Xonar Essence STX? Ten eerste is het een relatief nieuw type product, namelijk een geluidskaart met ingebouwde hoofdtelefoonversterker. Dit product is dus vooral gericht op "audiofielen" en gebruikers van hoofdtelefoons. High-End hoofdtelefoons nemen namelijk zoveel vermogen af, dat enkel een geluidskaart ze niet goed kan aansturen. Er moet dan dus een versterker tussen zitten, meestal ter waarde van €50 tot €100. Dit gegeven maakt deze geluidskaart dus een aantrekkelijke optie. Aankomst Ik had de kaart besteld bij DataByte, die hem direct verstuurde en twee dagen later was hij in huis. De doos die 960 gram weegt, is vrij gemakkelijk open te maken. In de doos zat de: • Kaart (gelukkig) • een...
[Reactie gewijzigd door n0elite op 22 juli 2024 20:03]
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6337321-post34.htmlThat pretty much leaves power supply mods which in some cases can have a huge effect. Mainly more extended bass & possibly smoother highs are the improvements I would likely see here.
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6337334-post35.htmlHowever, both cards have too much jitter because they both use a low quality oscillator. They also both use ceramic capacitors in the signal path - they are in the low-pass filter in the I/V op amp stage. These add distortion in the very high frequency ranges. So overall, neither give truly sweet clean treble unless these components are replaced.
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6149419-post11.htmlYes I noticed the ST can have quite aggressive upper mids/treble at times
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6323560-post22.htmlSo it seems to me the Onkyo is actually more of a hi-fi card that the ST but the ST is much easier to customise to make it sound how you'd like. Just looking at the design, component selection and manufacture, you can see the Onkyo engineers followed the audiophile hi-fi path and the ST engineers cut-and-paste from Texas Instruments datasheets ( and that included putting smt caps in the feedback loop for the I/V op amps to limit their bandwidth - a definite no-no in audiophile terms - and so I felt I had to remove them and fit metallised polypropylene caps. )
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6323126-post16.htmlthoppa had to mod his ST like hell to make it almost "comparable" to his Onkyo SE200, from what *he* said
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6184308-post1.htmlhehe, I sold my STX more than 6 months ago...it's like the 49720, it's impressive when it's your new toy, then it becomes agressive and unbearable after a little while.
plus the drivers were giving me suicidal tendencies
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6339456-post21.htmlRecently reinstalled my Elite Pro again after some time with my Essence ST.
idea of this thread is to really bump the Elite Pro which seem to have gone forgotten.
I must say the Elite Pro does really outclass the Essence and not by a small margin with my gear. I do have dedicated headphone amps so I am reviewing the line outs here.
The difference in soundstaging is tremendous. I exchanged the opamps on my essence to the 49720NA which certainly helped some in that area. But it´s not even close to the Elite Pro. It just present the music way better. I also appreciate there is less bass boost on the Elite Pro. Just about all my gear sound better balanced on it and it´s so much easier to portray the orchestras.
Now the Elite Pro don´t allow opamp switching. Is there any opamps that gives soundstaging to the Essence ST to rival the Elite Pro
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6323560-post22.htmlyesterday i've got the asus xonar essence as i have sennheiser pc-350 headphones and i needed amp for them (150 ohms) - that xonar boasted a headphone amp.
ok, the sound does come out louder, it doesnt mean it's of better quality.
im referring strictly to games. in gta 4 the sound on xonar sounds bad (like coming from a barrel) - as compared to x-fi titanium i had also.
xonar essence boasts also dolby headphone - disappointment too, very little effect put into, but no sounds filling my head as i would expected.
in dirt 2 the sound experience was so-so, lets say its good.
i will have to stress out that only today im gonna test the xonar on music with decent signal (yesterday only listened to low quality signal music and i didnt like it either)
i do hope i wont have to send xonar essence back, but if further testing will confirm my disappointment, i'll just return it and stick to my x-fi titanium.
OR, return it and ask them to send me instead an x-fi titanium fatality pro ( though i hope i wont have windows 7 driver problems with that one, as i've heard it may happen)
yes, i admit i am primarily a gamer, but i do listen to music (symphonic and rock) ocasionally.
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/5927467-post504.htmlanyhow, many friends have bought an HD2 Advance Deluxe on my advice, and they have all sold their STX/ST right away.
much more musical/less spikey and agressive trebles, much more stable non-resampling drivers...everything the STX should have been basically, but failed trying.
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6272668-post1013.htmlI'm using the STX line out of a dedicated HTPC to my stereo. The PC has replaced an older Pioneer CDP for audio. So far the PC sounds a bit better and I am listening to more music, but the highs are fatiguing with some music and I feel that I am losing some of the lower level details
Thanks for sharing your experiences. With which opamps are you comparing the X-Meridian to the ST? Also could you comment on how they compare with respect to listening fatigue?
Stock opamps both, fatigue wise i would say the the ST is the challenging one, because on quality stations like Avro Klassiek it brings out polyphony and a detailed sound stage at levels that after a while cause fatigue
[Reactie gewijzigd door Verwijderd op 22 juli 2024 20:03]
[Reactie gewijzigd door Verwijderd op 22 juli 2024 20:03]
[Reactie gewijzigd door Devil777 op 22 juli 2024 20:03]
[Reactie gewijzigd door Roderiktweaker op 22 juli 2024 20:03]
[Reactie gewijzigd door vlaaing peerd op 22 juli 2024 20:03]
Om te kunnen reageren moet je ingelogd zijn