Brian Hook heeft z'n .plan geupdate met een dikke berg erg goede Q3 benchmarks. Check dit lijstje: performance hit bij 32-bit rendering:
Rage128 @ 640x480: 12%
Rage128 @ 1280x1024: 28%
RivaTNT @ 640x480: 12%
RivaTNT @ 1280x1024: 48%
RivaTNT2 @ 640x480: 4%
RivaTNT2 @ 1280x1024: 40%
Matrox G200 @ 640x480: 0% (driver maxed out?)
Matrox G200 @ 1280x1024: 28%
Matrox G400 MAX @ 1280x1024:13% (16-bit Z-buffer)
S3 Savage3D @ 640x480: 36%
[break]zie je die 13% bij de G400! Dit zegt Brian over:[/break]
Holy Mother of Moses, did you see those G400 MAX scores at 1280x1024?! That
is pure devastation in fill rate the likes we have not seen in years. Now,
granted, they are running with a 16-bit Z-buffer, but still...those are
pretty awe inspiring numbers.
Now, the flip side is that they're NOT the fastest at 640x480, which means
that their throughput (i.e. drivers) could use some work.
The Savage4 made a good showing, however we have the caveat that this was
using pre-production drivers delivered directly from S3. We hope that they
will release up to date drivers soon for the Savage4.
Also, the Savage4
numbers at 32-bit were using a 16-bit Z-buffer, so they had a slight
advantage there also.
TNT2 didn't take top honors in many of the fields, just the 640x480x32bpp
numbers, however it has the distinction of being very close to the top in
nearly all tests, so it's probably the best all around board if you care
about high res and 32bpp. TNT still is putting a way respectable showing,
and I've seen those Creative TNT boards now for as low as $79. That is as
close to a no-brainer as I've seen in a long time.
Voodoo2/3 is still putting in a very admirable show, albeit only in low
res modes (Voodoo2) and 16-bit. While its performance is above that of
the TNT2 in the 16bpp modes, it's not so far ahead as to have a dominating
lead. And it still pales in comparison to the G400 MAX.
We received some TNT2 Ultra boards, but I couldn't get them to work. When
those fire up for us I'll post the numbers, and maybe the landscape will
change.
Those G400 MAX numbers are high enough that I'm nervous about them, as in
maybe I did something wrong, but so far I've run the tests on several machines,
and it's pretty difficult to cheat with your drivers when you're fill rate
bound.
G400 kickt ass!
Voor een vriendelijker overzicht van de benchmarks moet je ff op deze page bij id Software kijken, daar staan ze netjes in een tabel.