Cookies op Tweakers

Tweakers maakt gebruik van cookies, onder andere om de website te analyseren, het gebruiksgemak te vergroten en advertenties te tonen. Door gebruik te maken van deze website, of door op 'Ga verder' te klikken, geef je toestemming voor het gebruik van cookies. Wil je meer informatie over cookies en hoe ze worden gebruikt, bekijk dan ons cookiebeleid.

Meer informatie

Door , , 0 reacties
Bron: Reverend's Pulpit

Reverend's Pulpit heeft een interview gepost met Gary Tarolli van 3dfx, waarin uiteraard weer de bekende vraag langs kwam wandelen. Wat is beter: anti-aliasing of Transforms & Lighting?

Q: I'll make an assumption here and say that the Voodoo4/Napalm won't incorporate a geometry processor. The point being it won't help much in most games and huge fill-rates is more important. Another point is that game engines need to be coded for transform & lighting in the first place. Meaning there aren't any or isn't going to be many games that will have that and therefore an on-board geometry processor would be a waste. How do you respond to people that says, "But isn't this the same as when 3dfx said, with the Voodoo3, that 32-bit rendering is not important because not many games will have that color/texture depth?".

A: It is different. First of all, 32-bit rendering slows you down but doesn't cost much more in terms of chip area, while geometry processing tends to speed things up but does cost a lot more in terms of chip area and final product cost. Before the argument went something like this - 16-bit for speed versus 32-bit for quality. Now the argument will go like this - geometry engine for more triangles vs. anti-aliasing for quality pixels. These are two VERY different tradeoffs. I foresee another giant newsgroup battle. What people don't realize is that there is no "right" answer - it's a very subjective decision as to which is better for a game player. For existing games, we feel strongly that geometry acceleration doesn't provide as much value as anti-aliasing. For future games, it's a closer call, but more geometry without anti-aliasing is only going to increase the number of aliased pixels on the screen, which is not a good thing.

Lees meer over

Moderatie-faq Wijzig weergave

Reacties


Er zijn nog geen reacties geplaatst

Op dit item kan niet meer gereageerd worden.



Apple iOS 10 Google Pixel Apple iPhone 7 Sony PlayStation VR AMD Radeon RX 480 4GB Battlefield 1 Google Android Nougat Watch Dogs 2

© 1998 - 2016 de Persgroep Online Services B.V. Tweakers vormt samen met o.a. Autotrack en Carsom.nl de Persgroep Online Services B.V. Hosting door True