De Elsa Erazor II bracht het er nogal slecht af in Tom's TNT comparison. Dimension5D heeft ook een review. Hun conclusie wat betreft de performance:
As you can see the ELSA Erazor II is typical Riva TNT in performance terms. But The Erazor II was slower than the Velocity 4400. Looking at the scores from my Holiday Video Card Guide, the Erazor II is a couple of frames slower than the Velocity 4400. I think that this has to do with the ELSA drivers using older drivers, than the Velocity 4400.Now the big deal with the Erazor II, like I said earlier is its inclusion of a heatsink/fan and 125MHz rated SGRAM. So does this combination make overclocking a viable option. I ran Quake 2 benchmarks at a core clock rate of 110MHz (compared to 90MHz default), and a memory clock rate of 125MHz (compared to 110MHz default).
BTW: volgens THG wordt de Erazor II niet meer geleverd met ventilator, waardoor het ding een stuk minder overklokbaar is.
