Blijkbaar zaten al die sites die nu een G400 review posten onder een NDA, want ze posten 'toevallig' net op de 20de allemaal hun review. Zo ook Matrox Users:
In my own personal opinion I think the G400 MAX is going to be an easy leader as far as 2D performance and overall image quality go, and one of the fastest if not the fastest 3D cards. I have had one or two minor problems with the G400 MAX as I have mentioned but I'll stress again it is a late beta board with late beta drivers so one or two glitches are to be expected and Matrox have been very keen to quickly track down and fix the source of my problems.
My only major concern is that the G400's will get let down by poor driver support as we have seen with the G200's to some extent. I'm sure this won't be the case, from discussions I've had with Matrox it really does sound like they have learnt from recent experiences and are determined that there will be no repeat. There is most definitely a Windows 9x OpenGL ICD already in a state in my opinion for public consumption and Matrox are saying there will also be a Windows NT OpenGL ICD when the boards ship. If this all does come together Matrox have got a formidable graphics card on their hands.
Ze hebben benchmarks, maar alleen in vergelijking met de G200, dus daar heb je bar weinig aan.