Door Femme Taken


Influence of PCI speed on RAID performance examined


It's been about 9 years since the first introduction of the PCI, Vesa and OPTi bus. The introduction of these technologies meant a revolution in bus bandwidth, which was at the time limited to a mere 5MB/s from the ISA-bus. Even though Vesa Local Bus (VLB) got off to a good start it was PCI that emerged victorious. The consequences of this can be felt to this day since we are still using the same PCI technology, introduced 9 years ago, in most of our modern desktop computers. The clock speed of 33MHz, the bus bandwidth of 32-bits and the maximum bandwidth of 133MB/s has stayed the same all this time.

It won't come as a shock to you when I say the hunger for more bus bandwidth has grown dramatically over the last decade. In the early '90s a hard disk could pat him on the back for achieving a transfer rate of 3MB/s or more. Components like 8-channel audio cards, TV-cards, RAID-adapters and Gigabit-Ethernet where nowhere to be found or had an exorbitantly high price tag. Nowadays it is not a big problem to create a situation where the bandwidth of the PCI-bus is the limiting factor. For that reason server and workstation solutions have made the step to faster forms of PCI with a bus bandwidth of 64-bits and clock speeds of 66, 100 or 133MHz. Most of the time these systems are equipped with more than one PCI bus to avoid devices sharing one bus. The benefits are evident: higher bandwidth, lower latencies and fewer conflicts between devices.

Regretfully these faster PCI variants are found to be too expensive for desktop systems. A new version of the current PCI system is in the making; PCI Express. PCI Express is a completely new technology that is based on serial rather than parallel data transfer. The technology will first of all be used to replace the current AGP (Accelerated Graphics Port) port but will in the near future also replace the current PCI-bus.

One of the biggest consumers of bus bandwidth is RAID storage. Even a simple stripe-set of two 10.000rpm Serial-ATA disks can fully use the PCI-bus in some cases. On the forums we regularly hear people say a large RAID array is useless on a normal PCI-bus. They base their opinion on the fact that an array of two or more disks can already generate a higher sequential transfer rate than the PCI-bus can provide. In practice a sequential access pattern is only one of many access patterns. Opening a large file in Photoshop for instance will in the most ideal case indeed be a sequential read (the read-head does not have to move to a different part of the disk). When reading large amounts of data on a disk with heavy fragmentation there will be a greater need for extra head movements. When starting an application of which the files are further apart or simultaneously running multiple disk-intensive tasks the transfer rates will fall far below the theoretic maximum. Depending on the rpm of the drive and the performance of the actuators a change in head-position will take on average 5.5 to 12.0ms or more. Each head-movement will result in a dip in the overall transfer rate. The differences can be so dramatic that even the fastest 15.000rpm hard disks can get a transfer rate of only 4MB/s using a completely random access pattern whilst a sequential transfer rate of 75MB/s is possible.

So the question is: to what extent does the maximum transfer rate of the standard PCI-bus limit the real world performance of desktop- and server- environments. To check if there is a real loss in performance when using fast RAID-arrays combined with low bus-speeds we have tested a pair of SCSI RAID-adapters in different PCI-configurations. The purpose of this test is not only to see if the PCI-bus is a bottleneck for present day servers and workstations, but also to demonstrate if PCI Express is a useful upgrade for future desktops which will in a couple of years have the same storage-performance as do the SCSI RAID-configurations tested by us.

Wat vind je van dit artikel?

Geef je mening in het Geachte Redactie-forum.

Nintendo Switch (OLED model) Apple iPhone SE (2022) LG G1 Google Pixel 6 Call of Duty: Vanguard Samsung Galaxy S22 Garmin fēnix 7 Nintendo Switch Lite

Tweakers vormt samen met Hardware Info, AutoTrack,, Nationale Vacaturebank, Intermediair en Independer DPG Online Services B.V.
Alle rechten voorbehouden © 1998 - 2022 Hosting door True

Tweakers maakt gebruik van cookies

Tweakers plaatst functionele en analytische cookies voor het functioneren van de website en het verbeteren van de website-ervaring. Deze cookies zijn noodzakelijk. Om op Tweakers relevantere advertenties te tonen en om ingesloten content van derden te tonen (bijvoorbeeld video's), vragen we je toestemming. Via ingesloten content kunnen derde partijen diensten leveren en verbeteren, bezoekersstatistieken bijhouden, gepersonaliseerde content tonen, gerichte advertenties tonen en gebruikersprofielen opbouwen. Hiervoor worden apparaatgegevens, IP-adres, geolocatie en surfgedrag vastgelegd.

Meer informatie vind je in ons cookiebeleid.


Toestemming beheren

Hieronder kun je per doeleinde of partij toestemming geven of intrekken. Meer informatie vind je in ons cookiebeleid.

Functioneel en analytisch

Deze cookies zijn noodzakelijk voor het functioneren van de website en het verbeteren van de website-ervaring. Klik op het informatie-icoon voor meer informatie. Meer details


    Relevantere advertenties

    Dit beperkt het aantal keer dat dezelfde advertentie getoond wordt (frequency capping) en maakt het mogelijk om binnen Tweakers contextuele advertenties te tonen op basis van pagina's die je hebt bezocht. Meer details

    Tweakers genereert een willekeurige unieke code als identifier. Deze data wordt niet gedeeld met adverteerders of andere derde partijen en je kunt niet buiten Tweakers gevolgd worden. Indien je bent ingelogd, wordt deze identifier gekoppeld aan je account. Indien je niet bent ingelogd, wordt deze identifier gekoppeld aan je sessie die maximaal 4 maanden actief blijft. Je kunt deze toestemming te allen tijde intrekken.

    Ingesloten content van derden

    Deze cookies kunnen door derde partijen geplaatst worden via ingesloten content. Klik op het informatie-icoon voor meer informatie over de verwerkingsdoeleinden. Meer details